Friday, February 7, 2014

Scottish independence: Seven months to save UK, Cameron says

Jason Cannon
2/7/14
Great Britain

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26071166

Synopsis:

Britain Prime Minister David Cameron gave a speech recently trying to get UK citizens to encourage Scotland to not vote for independence.  Scotland citizens will vote on whether Scotland should break from the UK in September when the Scottish National Party puts forward the referendum.  Prime Minister Cameron talked about his Scottish heritage and how the issue was "personal".  He also mentioned the "four compelling reasons" for Scotland to not break from the UK.  The reasons, as stated by the article, were "the economic benefits of being a bigger country, greater international clout, connections between people, and the cultural impact of the UK."  The leader of the Scottish National Party, Alex Salmond,  ripped on Cameron for being unwilling to comply to his requests for a publicly televised debate in Scotland.  A spokesman for those in favor of Scotland independence stated, "In September, we have a chance to put Scotland's future in Scotland's hands and ensure that we always get the government we vote for."

Detailed Analysis/Comments

I think that Cameron's desire to keep Scotland a part of the country is a good one for the UK.  The reasons Cameron stated seem valid and logical.  The article expounded on  the cultural side of the issue, basically saying that Scotland was a very important element of the British culture.  If Scotland were to leave it would take a big chunk out of the culture, economy, and power of the UK.  I do think that Cameron should accept the proposed debate though.  If he really thinks he as good reasons and logic behind his arguments, he shouldn't be afraid of presenting his arguments in front of the Scottish public in a debate.

The article emphasized to me how important the regional differences are in the UK.  The region that they have roots in is a major part of their identity.  They see Scotland, Wales, Ireland, and England as very different places with different cultures.  Obviously Scotland sees themself as different and separate if they want to become independent.

Although I don't know much about the situation, I assume that Scotland has some valid reasons as to why they want to become independent.  My gut reaction would be to tell them to stick with Britain and not be so rebellious, but in thinking about America's history I might reconsider.  The Britains probably thought the same thing as me when America rebelled and fought for independence.  Looking at America's past helps me to respect the stance of Scotland.

2 comments:

  1. I agree Jason. Cameron's desire to keep Scotland dependent makes sense, but he should definitely participate in a debate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My guess as to why Cameron would decline to have a public debate is because I think that by accepting the invite and allowing it to be televised would be viewed to some as him accepting or recognizing the idea of Scotland breaking off. If Cameron had a debate, it would make him seem more willing to negotiate and consider Scotland leaving. By not having a debate, it solidifies his stout opposition from Scotland breaking off which is good, and is what GB Wants. But that's just what I think, my biggest concern would be the economic effect, as I have stock in the Royal Bank of Scotland so they better behave!

    ReplyDelete